Stalkers. Creeps. Weirdos. Terror. Welcome To Location, Facebook

The countdown is officially on for the big Facebook location backlash. How long will it be? One week? Two weeks? We all know it’s coming, it’s just a matter of when. And that’s too bad because I think Places is actually pretty great — potentially.

The ACLU wasted little time yesterday trying to start such a backlash (their post on the matter came what, a whole 30 seconds after the press conference ended?). Evelyn already did a nice job deconstructing many of their arguments and showing why a few were ridiculous. All I can add is to say that thank god the ACLU doesn’t design consumer apps — it would be like Facebook’s current nightmare of settings multiplied by a billion. We’d have settings for individual minutes in individual days for when individual users could see individual profiles. It would be the least social social network ever.

Today, the EFF followed up the ACLU’s post by citing things like pleaserobme.com as an illustration of how sensitive location information can be. Not cited is the fact that most people have jobs which they are at from 9 to 5 everyday, so they’re not likely to be home then, leaving their houses susceptible to robbery.

My point is that plenty of people right now are out there on the hunt for a way to show that Facebook Places is the devil. It’s an easy angle. You take something that already is a very sensitive topic: Facebook privacy — and combine it with another sensitive topic: location privacy. Boom. Match made in hell.

I thought Facebook’s presentation (and video) about Places yesterday was great because it focused on the positive. The talk was about serendipitous meetups and friends nearby, not people being stalked or worse. It seems like Facebook fully understands that location has the potential to be the bridge between social networking and actually being social. I’m just surprised it has taken them this long to launch a product.

But clearly they wanted to be careful. And they’re still being careful. Places is about as bare-bones as a location service can be. It is just check-ins. And that’s undoubtedly why they’re paying homage to Foursquare in the Places logo. Without Foursquare, Places would not exist.

But after only one day of using Places I’m seeing the potential here. I’m seeing friends checking-in who I’ve never seen use Foursquare. I’ve seen some friends check-in who I’m fairly positive have no idea what Foursquare is. Earlier, I was in a park near my apartment and I checked-in and saw that 30-some other people that I wasn’t friends with were checked-in there as well.

To some people, that’s creepy (it has been a feature on Foursquare for a while and that’s basically what Loopt was for a while). But to me, I think that’s potentially really interesting for when it comes to meeting people. And the fact that so many had checked-in on day one of the service is impressive.

That’s the power of Facebook’s social graph. It’s a graph that none of the current location players can touch even if you added all of their users together and multiplied them by twenty. Facebook is going to bring location to the mainstream by virtue of their size alone.

But the flip side is that because Facebook has such a large social graph that’s already established, a lot of current users are going to feel this new layer as something being forced upon them. And again, creepy. Of course there’s the option not to use it, but I can certainly see how the friend tagging thing is troubling to a lot of people (particularly because of the somewhat confusing three states).

But it’s also potentially a great tool. Imagine if you’re with a group of friends and only one of you has to check everyone in. That’s the cure for check-in fatigue right there. And when you think about it, this functionality isn’t much different than the tweets we’ve all sent that state something like “at the park with @____ @_____ @_____ and @_______”.

But the real key of Facebook Places is as a platform. Though it is still in the process of being turned on, it’s going to be great to be able to load up one app and see where people from Foursquare, Gowalla, Yelp, etc have all checked-in. And even better will be when you can check-in on Facebook Places and push it out to these services (so far, only Gowalla has committed to working on this as far as I know).

These services are all going to have to focus on building great utilities on top of this platform because the check-in will finally be completely commoditized. And that’s a good thing. I hope the Places API becomes the Facebook Connect for check-ins so the real innovation can begin. We need to remove the “ugh, another service I have to check-in to” factor.

That’s undoubtedly what Facebook is hoping for too. It’s a potential new branch of the Platform.

While location obviously has risks associated with it, it’s the upside that has all of these startups and now bigger players interested in the space. It’s easy to forget about this upside and instead worry about how everyone is going to be stalking one another. You know, the same things people used to say about the Internet itself back in the day.


Posted in 2. New Media Trends, Mobile, TC, facebook, facebook places, featured, foursquare | Tagged | Comments Off

Foursquare Experiences Record Signups After Launch of Facebook Places


Foursquare is experiencing record interest in the wake of the launch of Facebook Places; on Thursday, the location service broke its record for new user signups.

Facebook Places brings checkins and location broadcasting to Facebook’s massive 500 million user base. It’s the bread-and-butter of Foursquare, which has led to a lot of speculation over the future of Foursquare and the company’s next moves. Can it survive in the face of competition from a behemoth like Facebook?

At least for now, the answer seems to be yes. According to a tweet from Foursquare CEO Dennis Crowley, the company had its “biggest day ever” for signups of new users on Thursday. The surge in signups was probably due to the countless comparisons people are making between Facebook Places and Foursquare. With heightened media and user interest, it’s no wonder people are signing up to find out what this location thing is all about.

Record signups doesn’t mean the company’s in the clear, though. As the weeks and months pass and Places establishes itself as a service, we’ll get a better picture of whether Foursquare can fend off Facebook’s advances and continue its rapid growth.

In an interview with Mashable, Crowley said that he believes Facebook and Foursquare serve two different purposes. “Facebook is about sharing experiences that you’ve had,” he said. “Foursquare is more about the present tense and the future tense.”

Foursquare is approaching 3 million users, but that’s still a drop in the bucket compared to Facebook’s 500+ million users. For Foursquare’s sake, let’s hope Crowley is right that the two services fulfill different purposes.


Reviews: Facebook, Foursquare, Mashable

More About: facebook, Facebook Places, foursquare, trending

For more Mobile coverage:

Posted in 2. New Media Trends, News, Top Stories, facebook, facebook places, foursquare, mashable, trending | Tagged | Comments Off

Study Shows People Are Clueless About Energy Savings – Here’s What Actually Works.

Quick, name one of the best things you can do to save energy at home. If you said “turning off the lights,” you’d be wrong. But you are not alone, most Americans say the same thing. A new survey shows most people have misconceptions about what works best to save energy.

Keeping lights off isn’t a bad idea in itself, but it has significantly less impact than swapping out the bulbs for more energy-efficient ones, says Shahzeen Attari, who published a paper on the survey.

In some cases, leaving energy-efficient lights on may actually be more effective: according the the Department of Energy, the lifespan of compact fluorescents, or CFLs, is decreased by being frequently switched off and on. If you are leaving the room for less than 15 minutes, it is actually more efficient to keep a CFL on for that time. If you will be gone for more than 15 minutes, however, it is more efficient to switch the light off.

Survey participants were asked an open-ended question on what they thought was the single most effective thing they could do to conserve energy in their lives. Attari put the most common responses into two main categories: curtailment, meaning not doing something as often, and efficiency, meaning making their energy use itself less wasteful.

The majority of the participants’ answers, such as turning off lights, changing thermostat settings and unplugging appliances, fell into the curtailment category. These actions are certainly helpful, but even more effective are efficiency changes, such as using CFL light bulbs, buying Energy Star appliances, and driving a hybrid car. In other words, it’s better to buy new, efficient equipment than to sparingly use older, energy-hungry products.

This graph shows survey participants’ mean perceived energy usage or savings in watts per hour versus actual energy usage or savings. The dotted line represents perfect accuracy:

Perceptions were often inaccurate. For example, many thought central air conditioning uses only 1.3 times the energy of a single room AC unit, when it actually uses around 3.5 times as much energy.

Many consumers don’t have a good concept of how much energy per hour a given appliance uses. People understand how much energy goes into a light bulb per hour, Attari said, but not the equivalent of how many light bulbs per hour are used by a dishwasher.

Attari also attributed a psychological phenomenon called single action bias, in which a person does one or two things to address a problem and considers themselves off the hook, as an explanation of why some believe they do more to conserve energy than they really are. When those one or two things fall into curtailment, like turning off the lights, instead of efficiency, like replacing the washer, they help less than some perceive.

Psychology aside, if each of us were to do just one or two things to save energy, Attari recommends they be replacing light bulbs with CFL bulbs and weatherizing our homes. Generalized recommendations can be muddy, however, as each person’s energy usage is different. This means that for some, the most effective thing might be to use public transportation instead of driving, or to line-dry clothes after washing them.

In another report, Gerald T. Gardner and Paul C. Stern compiled a short list of the most effective things Americans can do to save energy. Using warm or cold water to wash clothes and installing or upgrading attic insulation are two of their suggestions. See the full list in the table below:

Here are five of the most effective things you can at home to lower your energy consumption:

1. Replace incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs
2. Weatherize your home with caulk or weather-stripping (80% of older homes are under-insulated)
3. Install a more efficient heating and/or air conditioning unit
4. Install or upgrade attic insulation and ventilation
5. Adjust your washing machine settings to warm, or even cold, water

Photo credit: Flickr via lunchtimemama
Graph via the paper “Public Perceptions of Energy Consumption and Savings
Table via Environment Magazine


Posted in 2. New Media Trends, Department of Energy, GreenTech, Shahzeen Attari, TC, energy, survey | Tagged | Comments Off

Find Out What’s Trending on Facebook


This post is part of Mashable’s Spark of Genius series, which highlights a unique feature of startups. The series is made possible by Microsoft BizSpark.. If you would like to have your startup considered for inclusion, please see the details here.

Name: Booshaka

Quick Pitch: Booshaka shows you what’s trending on Facebook — right now. Booshaka aims to show the freshest, most relevant posts across the social web.

Genius Idea: With 500 million members, Facebook is the largest social network in the world and one of the primary places on the web where memes get started and hot topics are shared and discussed. Booshaka is a trend engine that works to surface publicly shared Facebook content and identify network-wide trends in real time.

Just as is the case with real-time Twitter search engines, users can use Booshaka to search what people on Facebook are saying about any given keyword. Those interested in a more general, hot topic search can select from pre-determined categories — think News, Deals, Brands and Gossip — to dive into Facebook chatter and view what’s trending.

Whether users define their own searches or opt for the category route, they can filter results for Trending Now, Most Popular, Most Buzz and Most Recent. Booshaka returns Facebook status updates as results and details total Likes, comments and buzz percentile. Users can then share individual results on Twitter or Facebook.

As a Facebook search engine, Booshaka is one of the first services to offer instant access to the public status updates resonating with Facebook users. For marketers, it could prove to be a useful utility in identifying the pulse of the people on Facebook, and for members it could serve as tool to catch up on the hot topics, news and gossip of the day.


Sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark


BizSpark is a startup program that gives you three-year access to the latest Microsoft development tools, as well as connecting you to a nationwide network of investors and incubators. There are no upfront costs, so if your business is privately owned, less than three years old, and generates less than U.S.$1 million in annual revenue, you can sign up today.


Reviews: Facebook, Twitter, news

More About: booshaka, facebook, trends

For more Social Media coverage:

Posted in 2. New Media Trends, Startup, Web Apps, Web2.0 Startups, booshaka, facebook, spark-of-genius, trends | Tagged | Comments Off

What You Need To Know About Data Portability


Elias Bizannes is the chairperson and executive director of the DataPortability Project. He is also the founder of the StartupBus, the Silicon Beach community, and works at search engine startup Vast.com, Inc.

Data Portability can be loosely described as the free flow of people’s personal information across the Internet, within their control. It has now become a standard term in the Internet industry in the context of cloud computing, open standards and privacy.

Examples of data portability include:

  • Being able to import all your social network connections, media and other data to another service with the click of a button.
  • The ability to reuse your health records when visiting different doctors and jurisdictions.
  • Not having to re-enter your credit card information when a service you use changes payment gateways.

Why Does it Matter for People?


Your data is exactly that: It’s yours. It should be your right to be able to control what you and others do with it. If you upload your photos to Facebook, why can’t you access them in the community-sharing website Flickr, or edit those same photos without re-uploading them with the online version of Photoshop? No company online should own you. No company offline owns humans, so why can’t you do what you want with your data online?

We are at a point in the Internet’s evolution where there are thousands of services that can reuse the same data. The storage of data is now a separate value function from the processing or output of it. We can now build a world where we have privacy-respecting interoperability and unlock value, in the same way trade agreements between countries have brought a higher standard of living to populations that suffer a comparative disadvantage.

To use another analogy, consider how money is a standard value exchange in all economies. Sophisticated financial systems have been developed that allow money stored in one bank to be transferred to another bank or organization (for instance, when you pay a restaurant with a debit card). This free flow of money in a regulated system has given us more freedom, security, and utility with regard to personal finance. In turn, this has enabled greater economic opportunities in many parts of the world.

So why can’t our personal information work the same way? Why can’t anything connected to the Internet adhere to interoperability standards so that –- with your full control -– data can flow to another system with no extra effort? The answer is that it can, but companies have not yet realized the full benefits of opening their platforms up. Furthermore, it’s clear that consumers want data portability, but they have no way to channel their demand, and as such, companies have not made it a priority.


Why Does it Matter for Companies?


Data, such as people’s personal information, can lose value over time. For example, a social network that keeps historical data of your occupation, relationships, or city of residence may be inaccurate today if they’ve focused on hoarding your data rather than building a relationship with you that makes you want to keep it up-to-date. Companies that wish to monetize your data or create value (like using your social graph to personalize an experience), will benefit not from owning your data — as so-called “walled gardens” of the past have tried to — but rather by cultivating a relationship with you — one in which they have persistant access to you. The consequences of this way of thinking are profound. Instead of the hostility that comes when users are locked in, it encourages innovation and superior service to ensure that the flow of data doesn’t close off.

Companies can also get a bigger piece of the data pie when embracing portability. If web services could assemble as a “federation” based on trusted data exchanges, they could get access to more timely and relevant data than they otherwise would on their own. The pie is bigger and everyone benefits.


What is a Data Portability Policy?


The technology to enable data portability does exist. What we lack in business however, is a cultural acceptance that opening up your data to competing services is beneficial.

What we also lack is broader consumer awareness, or rather, the ability to channel our requests in a way that is understood by service providers. It’s hard to imagine why we needed the Internet before we had it, but now that we do, it has become so crucial to commerce, education and journalism that governments are legislating access to it as a legal right. When it comes to data portability, we as consumers lack a common language for this kind of targeted advocacy.

This is where the concept of the “portability policy” comes in. Whereas a privacy policy discloses what a company can do with your data, a portability policy discloses how a user can access and transfer their own data once it’s stored with that company.

Websites, for the most part, are doing great things for their users, but there isn’t a standard way of communicating what rights they provide. Instituting a uniform portability policy allows us to compare websites side-by-side. It’s a form of disclosure to discharge accountability to a website’s stakeholders, in the same way that capital markets require companies to discharge their accountability through financial reporting.

The incentive for a company to have a portability policy is simple: It builds trust. By disclosing the policy in common terms, you are opening a communication channel with your users and will be able to better manage expectations.


What Should Be Included In a Data Portability Policy?


At a minimum, a Portability Policy should answer the questions on the Portability Policy questionnaire created by my organization. (A free tool has also been released that can assist you with this with a proforma.) Not all the questions need an answer; for some industries they may not have relevance.

Take the opportunity to answer the questions and explain why your company has approached the issues of data portability in the way that you have. For example, you might want to explain why you support a specific type of open standard to the detriment of another when answering the question about APIs and documented data formats (e.g., “We support the ATOM protocol but not other RSS standards, because we believe ATOM is technically superior to alternatives.”), or you can give an insight into your future plans (e.g., “We currently allow you to use your existing identities, such as Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, to login into our service. We also support the OpenID standard because we believe in advancing this open effort. However, we do not support authenticating with your Twitter identity because we believe the costs of supporting this authentication outweighs the benefit – few of our users seem to have Twitter accounts. With that said, we are open to changing our policy if demand warrants it.”).

Several companies have already launched Portability Policies. Examples include the .tel registrar, location startup Topguest and media company Tubefilter. As you will notice, each has answered the same set of questions very differently, based on the circumstances of their markets.

The Portability Policy initiative is still in its infant stages and will grow as awareness increases, with more specific questions emerging when issues are identified. In the meantime, you can help by asking companies a simple question: Where’s your portability policy?


More Data Resources from Mashable:

- How Data Will Impact the Way We Do Business
- How Online Retailers Can Leverage Facebook’s Open Graph
- Why You Need to Monitor and Measure Your Brand on Social Media
- How Open Data Applications are Improving Government
- 5 Ways To Turn Your Traffic Into Valuable User Data

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, Yakobchuk

[img credit: Anne Helmond]


Reviews: Adobe Photoshop, Facebook, Flickr, Google, Internet, Twitter, iStockphoto

More About: business, data, data portability, information, internet, portability, privacy, small business, transfer

For more Business coverage:

Posted in 2. New Media Trends, business, contributor, data, data portability, features, information, internet, mashable, portability, privacy, small business, transfer | Tagged | Comments Off

A Nice Side Effect Of The Tweet Button: Real URLs Back In The Stream

The link shortening revolution that has taken place the past few years has been interesting for a number of reasons. But one of the most interesting aspects is that we’re all now trained to click on a URL even if we have no idea what it actually is. Sure, you may be visiting TechCrunch.com, but in Twitter’s stream, it has been hidden as http://bit.ly/lkowieofi or the like. Twitter Tweet Button changes that.

The new Tweet Button, which was officially unveiled by Twitter earlier today (and is already up and running on TechCrunch), by default wraps all links in Twitter’s own t.co URL shortener. But this shortening is only for the pop-up tweet box and so Twitter can make sure the URL isn’t a malicious one. When it is sent out to your tweet stream, you’ll now see the actual URL (though abbreviated).

For some examples of what I mean, see the images in this post. As you can see, TechCrunch links are now shown as techcrunch.com and Time links are shown as time.com. As you’ll also notice, gone is the http:// prefix. Twitter is following Google Chrome is getting rid of this when not needed.

Of course, we just implemented our own shortener, tcrn.ch, to work with the new Tweet Button — so now you’ll see that rather than techcrunch.com. But that’s okay because you’ll still know it’s a TechCrunch link (as you have been able to for a while thanks to Bit.ly). But this is really key for sites that don’t have their own custom shorteners — you’ll no longer have to wonder exactly where you’re about to go when you click on a link (assuming that link was sent via the Tweet Button).

Of course, there have been some browser plug-ins and extensions that have de-obfuscated links for some time now. And Bit.ly has been checking to make sure links being shortened we’re malicious for some time now also. But it will still be nice to see some actual URLs in the tweet stream again, so we know where the hell we’re about to go.

Right now, these original links are only shown on twitter.com, but soon partner clients will begin showing true links in the stream as well.


Posted in 2. New Media Trends, TC, Twitter, bit.ly, featured, tweet button | Tagged | Comments Off

A Look Back at the Last 5 Years in Blogging


In honor of Mashable’s five-year anniversary, this series is supported by IDG. Customers are talking about your brand and products — find out what they are saying with IDG Social Scout.

Five years is eons in Internet time, and a lot has changed in the blogosphere since 2005. Sites have been born, sites have died, sites have grown up and others have faded away. Entirely new blogging formats have been created and business empires have been built on the foundations of humble blog beginnings.

Today’s blogosphere is larger and more diverse than it was five years ago, and yet only a few blogs — the so-called “A-listers” — have risen to a place of dominance in the new media landscape. The blogosphere of 2010 is also powered in many ways by social media, something that barely existed five years ago, and was likely an afterthought to most hobbyist bloggers of the day.

How did we get from there to here? What follows is a look back at the last five years in the blogosphere.


Then and Now


In July 2005, by penning his first post on this site, Mashable CEO Pete Cashmore was joining a blogging movement that had already swelled to over 14 million blogs, and was growing at a rate of 80,000 per day. Yet, while most of those bloggers were of the journaling variety, Mashable was entering an evolving blogosphere. While 2005 was not the first year in which any one person made a living at blogging, it does mark a number of important milestones in the transition of the blogosphere as a place of primarily random thoughts and banalities to one that now supports a growing number of burgeoning media empires.

Blogging has entered the mainstream consciousness as a legitimate source of media, likely due to the sheer number of blogs on the Internet today (133 million and counting), even though the vast majority of blogs are still likely personal. According to the 2009 State of the Blogosphere report by Technorati, professional bloggers are blogging more than ever, while hobbyists are blogging less. One reason for that, as we’ll explore, might be the rise of social media.


Blogging as a Business


In February of 2005, blogger Jason Kottke decided to quit his job and move from a hobbyist to a full-time blogger. Though his experiment ultimately failed, Kottke’s bold move was in many ways indicative of a emerging blogging mentality that was to become more common over the next five years: Treating the blog as a startup enterprise.

Though large blogs like Boing Boing and DailyKos were already gaining influence compared to their mainstream media counterparts, three events in particular in 2005 helped legitimize blogs as viable business endeavors. First, Arianna Huffington launched The Huffington Post with a $2.5 million seed investment. Since then, the site has become the most popular blog on the Internet and a leading voice in American politics, with millions of contributors, both paid and unpaid. Furthermore, it has taken in about $37 million in venture capital funding. Of course, The Huffington Post’s rise to the top was not instant, but the site’s story is one that has affirmed the blog’s rightful place in the media business pantheon.

The second major event of 2005 was AOL’s purchase of Weblogs, Inc., the parent company of popular blogs like Engadget and Autoblog, for a reported $25 million. The successful exit of that major blogging property — one of only a handful of such blog networks in existence at the time — encouraged the development of the network model, in which multiple blogs are launched in tandem and link to one another for SEO reasons. Three years later, many of the Weblogs, Inc. blogs had seen triple- or quadruple-digit visitor growth, and the company had moved from paying a group of freelance writers on a per post and traffic basis, to hiring a growing number of full-time writers.

The most important occurrence for blogging in 2005, however, might have been the launch of Federated Media. Backed by The New York Times, Omidyar Network and a handful of angel investors, FM was one of the first major advertising firms to focus on blog properties, and that made it a lot easier for fledgling blog startups to grow into the major media brands that many of them have become.

Given the injection of cash from ad agencies like Federated Media, bloggers were able to spend more time producing content and had the capital to hire help. It was that simple combination of cash and time that caused the blogging model to ultimately be so successful, according to Steve Spalding, a Digital Business Strategist and Founder of the blog How To Split An Atom.

“As [blogs] kept making more content, they kept appearing in Google and kept getting linked to by bigger and better sites, which lead to more traffic, more relevance, more links and most importantly, more money,” he said. “Eventually you hit the tipping point where traffic, cash and relevancy make you skyrocket above the competition, which is where many of the big blogs find themselves today.”

Fast forward five years, and the Spalding equation (time + money + content) has worked its magic across the blogosphere. According to Technorati, 28% of bloggers reported earning some sort of income from blogging in 2009, and of those, the mean annual ad revenue for bloggers is over $42,000 — a healthy income in many parts of the world.

Disclosure: Mashable works with Federated Media.


The Rise of Social Media


Perhaps the biggest shift in blogging culture over the past half decade has been the rise of social media. One of the most visible ways in which social media has affected blogging is that it changed the type of content that dominates the blogosphere. According to Scott Rosenberg, co-founder of Salon.com and author of Say Everything: How Blogging Began, What it’s Becoming, and Why it Matters, social media provided a new home for a lot of minutiae around the blogosphere — status updates, shared links, passing observations — and freed up blogs for longer form, more valuable writing.

“In [the early] days it was common to hear the complaint from old media curmudgeons that blogs were worthless because, you know, who wants to know what you had for lunch?” said Rosenberg. “So today those messages are all on Facebook or Twitter, the curmudgeons get to toss their complaints at shiny new targets — and blogging, miraculously, has become the center of gravity for in-depth, substantial dialogue and inquiry online.”

Said Rosenberg, the rise of social media has birthed a blogosphere with more high-quality and thoughtful content. Social media hasn’t killed blogging, or replaced it, he said, but social networks have “deepened it, given it more clarity and heft.”

For Spalding, social media has created a more dynamic atmosphere, one brimming with new opportunities for networking and fodder for posts. “[Social media] hasn’t changed my world but it has expanded it in ways that are difficult to talk about unless you’ve spent a lot of time in the trenches with it,” he said.

Of course, for blogs, traffic equals money, so the most important change brought about by social media over the past five years may have been that social networks are increasingly a source of high quality traffic. According to a report from earlier this year via web measurement firm Hitwise, Facebook is now sending more traffic to news sites than mainstream aggregators like Google News. Twitter is also starting to move up the referrer ranks for news and media sites, said Hitwise.

While only a handful of blogs qualify for inclusion in the “news and media” category at that firm, it’s probably safe to assume that social media sources are becoming more and more important traffic generators for the generally very web savvy blogosphere. In fact, Hitwise reported last year that Facebook had become the top traffic referrer for the popular entertainment blog Perez Hilton. (There isn’t much more hard data to back that, however, beyond what I can deduce from the referrer logs of Mashable itself.)

When news of Facebook’s rise as a legitimate source of referral traffic spread across the web, noted blogger and PR veteran Steve Rubel commented on his blog, “If the 2000s was the Google decade, then the 2010s will be the Facebook decade.” That’s even more true for bloggers if we replace “Google” with “search,” and “Facebook” with “social media.” Where getting visitors to your website over the past decade was often focused around search engine optimization, attention has shifted in the last five years to social media and the ever-expanding myriad of options and niche sites therein. SEO is still important, of course, but it is now a much smaller piece of a more complicated puzzle.


Blogging Infiltrates News Media


“[Blogs] are an essential part of the news landscape, and they have gained more credibility — mostly because there’s less knee-jerk anti-blog reaction today,” said Rosenberg in an e-mail interview. “We now have serious and respected news providers and cultural agenda-setters that started out as independent blogs (like Talking Points Memo and Boing Boing). We also have blogs that are manned by employees of major old-fashioned media organizations.”

In December of 2009, Mashable’s Community Manager (and then freelance contributor) Vadim Lavrusik wrote that the future journalist will — out of necessity — borrow many of the tools and techniques cultivated by bloggers over the past decade. “To be a social journalist and one that engages in online communities, journalists will have to practice blogging regularly and serve as curators of other content on the web,” he wrote. “Journalists of tomorrow will be participating in the link economy by gathering, synthesizing and making sense of other content across the web.”

The “link economy,” in which authors link to one another to add context and provide readers with different viewpoints, has long been the domain of bloggers. Of course, one oft-hurled criticism is that bloggers don’t add original reporting, they just link to it and comment on it. While that may be part of what many bloggers do, and while that may have been partly (but not completely) true five years ago, it certainly isn’t the whole story today. Most of the major blogs that were founded in the past 5 to 10 years offer a mix of their own reporting, curation of reporting from the around the web, and commentary.

The debate about whether bloggers are journalists has even reached the upper echelons of government. In 2007, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in favor of a bill that would extend traditional media shield protections offered to journalists to bloggers. That, for many, was a clear message that blogging as a medium had become a vital part of the news media landscape. And indeed, in the intervening years, blogging has been instrumental in documenting human rights abuses, has been cited for prestigious awards and has outranked the mainstream press in search listings.

Over the past five years, mainstream journalists are finally starting to accept that curation of news is a legitimate journalistic pursuit. When the political blog Talking Points Memo broke the U.S. attorney scandal in 2007, it was their ability to bring together information from other reporters and synthesize and clarify that information for readers that made them such a leading voice on the story. “[Talking Points Memo founder Matt] Marshall and his staff broke quite a few ’scoops’ in their months-long investigation into the firings,” wrote Robert Niles of the Online Journalism Review. “But they shed much light on the emerging scandal by stitching together reporting from local journalists as well. TPM Media reporters gathered information by working phones, swapping e-mails, and searching documents, as well as following reporting from San Diego’s Union-Tribune and North County Times, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette and McClatchy’s Washington bureau covering the firings of respected local U.S. Attorneys and their replacement with Bush administration loyalists.”

According to Niles, current American media newsrooms are isolated and rarely rely on reporting from competing news outlets. Blogs, on the other hand, practice the increasingly more accepted art of curation, allowing them to “reveal a more complete and accurate truth for their readers.”

Perhaps even more elucidating, as Rosenberg noted, almost every major traditional media outlet has added blogging over the past five years to their stable of distribution channels (to be precise, 48.55% of media outlets now have blogs; that number is likely higher among the major, national outlets, though). From the New York Times to CNN, from the The Guardian, blogs are now an important and prominently displayed way to deliver the news. And the number of journalists blogging is expected to increase.


The Changing Landscape of Blog Software


One other major event would reshape the blog world in 2005: The launch of WordPress.com. The free, hosted blogging service gave anyone access to a full WordPress installation, something that previously required some technical expertise (though a few web hosts were already offering their own hosted solutions). It can’t be understated the dramatic effect that WordPress.com has had on blogging. Along with the self-hosted version of the software, WordPress accounts for some 25 million blogs, of which over 11 million are hosted on WordPress.com and serve over 2 billion pageviews each month.

Statistics aside, what WordPress really offered to users was a marriage of ease of use with power. WordPress is a powerful software package — one that many websites use in lieu of a full content management system — and WordPress.com brought that power to the masses in an easy to use package. WordPress.com has been a major component of the growth of the blogosphere over the past five years.

Yet, WordPress’ rise isn’t the only major story in the world of blog software over the last half decade. The other is the advent of tumblelogs. Tumblelogs are stream of consciousness weblogs that have distinct ways of displaying different types of content — text, quotes, videos, photos, links, etc. Though only recently have news outlets begun experimenting with them for serious blogging, tumblelogs have become extremely popular due to their ease of use.

Tumblr, the most popular tumblelog hosting service, has seen extremely impressive growth since launching in 2007 and now serves over 1 billion pageviews per month, making it about half the size of WordPress.com. In other words, tumblelogs have been firmly embraced by mainstream users as a legitimate form of blogging.

The interoperability of tools has also made the technical bits of blogging easier, said Spalding. Five or six years ago, for example, it wasn’t very easy to find a video and insert it into a post, but now you can locate a video in seconds on YouTube and embed it by copying and pasting a few lines of text. Those improving tools, like WordPress.com, Tumblr and YouTube embeds, are what have caused the wild growth in the blogosphere over the second half of the the last decade. “Blogging tools have made it easier for people to focus on content production rather than the often tedious process of content formatting. If anything is responsible for the popularity of blogging the steady improvement of the tools over the years has to be it,” Spalding said.


What’s Next?


Blogging has come a long way since 2005. From a rather unorganized collection of mostly personal diarists, to a major voice in the news media landscape, blogging is clearly one of the stars of today’s Internet. “These days almost everyone is a ‘blogger’ and the delineation between someone who gets 5 visitors a year and 50,000 visitors an hour is a little blurry,” said Spalding. “I think that’s a good thing because, the faster we walk away from the label ‘blogger,’ the faster we can get down to the real business of producing valuable content for the people who are looking to read it.”

The community of those who call themselves “bloggers” has grown to the point where generalizations no longer work. When everyone is a blogger, a blogger can be many different things. “There are so many different [blogging communities],” said Rosenberg. “There’s the political blogosphere with its various partisan subsections, the tech blogosphere (with subdivisions for developers and startup people and VCs and social media folks and more), the world of BlogHer, the crafts people, the culture bloggers, the cool gang in Tumblr-land, the science bloggers and law bloggers and librarians and on and on. As blogging went mainstream, it came to reflect the diversity of the human population, not perfectly of course, but widely enough to warn us all off from making broad statements about its attitude or makeup.”

That splintering of the blogosphere is likely to continue into the next decade. The big blogs will continue to grow and become more ingrained in the media landscape, while niche communities of bloggers will further codify. The blogosphere will, as Rosenberg said, continue to reflect humankind’s diversity.

Specifically, though, blogs will probably evolve over the next five years in ways we can’t yet fathom. “These days, I just enjoy the ride,” Spalding told us. That’s good advice.


Series supported by IDG

In honor of Mashable’s five-year anniversary, this series is supported by IDG. Brand listening is the foundation for an effective social marketing campaign. Understand what your prospects care about before you engage with them, with IDG’s brand listening services. IDG Social Scout can help you to understand your prospects’ conversations, plan a social marketing program and implement it. IDG has the audience and content expertise to meet your objectives. Start with a solid plan that IDG Social Scout services deliver based on analysis and insight. Learn more about how IDG Social Scout can help you by clicking here.


More Social Media Resources From Mashable:


- HOW TO: Build a More Beautiful Blog
- A Look Back at the Last 5 Years in Mobile
- A Look Back at the Last 5 Years in Social Media
- 11 Free Services for Scheduling Social Media Updates
- HOW TO: Send an Audio Tweet

Image courtesy of iStockphoto, Bluberries

[img credit: rishibando]


Reviews: Facebook, Google, Internet, Mashable, Tumblr, Twitter, WordPress, YouTube, iStockphoto

More About: blog, blogger, blogging, federated media, social media, social-media-retrospective-series, tumblelog, tumblelogs, tumblr, Wordpress, wordpress.com

For more Social Media coverage:

Posted in 2. New Media Trends, Wordpress, blog, blogger, blogging, features, federated media, mashable, social media, social-media-retrospective-series, tumblelog, tumblelogs, tumblr, wordpress.com | Tagged | Comments Off

U.A.E. Moves to Block BlackBerry Services

The United Arab Emirates said that it cannot adequately monitor the company’s e-mail and text messaging services.

Posted in 2. New Media Trends, Blackberry (Handheld Device), Computer Security, Research In Motion Ltd|RIMM|NASDAQ, Saudi Arabia, Surveillance of Citizens by Government, United Arab Emirates, Wireless Communications | Tagged | Comments Off

Social Networking Dominates Our Time Spent Online [STATS]


Social networking now eats up twice as much of our online time as any other activity. According to new stats from Nielsen, sites like Facebook and Twitter now account for 22.7% of time spent on the web; the next closest activity is online games, which make up 10.2%.

The stats also show the degree to which social networking is displacing other forms of communication, with e-mail as a percentage of online time plunging from 11.5% to 8.3% from June 2009 to June 2010. Instant messaging also saw a significant drop in share, with a 15% decline from last year.

However, e-mail use on mobile is still on the rise – from 37.4% to 41.6% — presumably as users continue to migrate to smartphones from feature phones.

Here’s the full breakdown from Nielsen:

Are these trends consistent with your own online usage and the trends you’re seeing elsewhere? Let us know in the comments.

[img credit: foreversouls]

More About: e-mail, Mobile 2.0, social networking, stats, trending

For more Social Media coverage:

Posted in 2. New Media Trends, Mobile 2.0, Top Stories, e-mail, social media, social networking, stats, trending | Tagged | Comments Off

Drunken Tweets To Plummet Tomorrow Night As Twitter Will Be Down

Tomorrow night, July 31, Twitter has announced they are having some planned downtime. Beginning at 11 PM PT, Twitter will likely be down on and off for up to 5 hours, Twitter warns.

The reason for the downtime? NTT America, Twitter’s hosting provider is upgrading a part of the internal network. This is interesting because Twitter is in the process of opening their own data center in Utah later this year. Despite the new tweet digs, they’ve said they’ll keep working with NTT America, so this maintenance is clearly necessary.

If you see the picture above tomorrow night, you’ll know what’s up. There will be a link on it to the Status Blog where you can get status updates on the work.


Posted in 2. New Media Trends, TC, Twitter | Tagged | Comments Off